Skip to main content

The Word of Truth


The “word of truth” refers to the gospel (Eph. 1:13) and to the whole Bible (Ps. 119:43; 2 Cor. 6:7). How would we know for sure the gospel is right if the whole Bible is not right?

We must rightly divide the word of truth because:
1. There are different gospels revealed in the Bible - The "word of truth" by which Israel will be born again (Jam. 1:18) is not the same word of truth by which we are saved today.
2. There are different dispensations and ages revealed in the Bible. God gives different instructions to different groups living at different times. We cannot possibly follow the whole Bible.

Believing the Bible (2 Tim. 3:16) and rightly dividing it (2 Tim. 2:15) go hand in hand. The only way to understand the Bible without changing any words and just letting it say exactly what it says, is to rightly divide it. The KJB is a dispensational book. That is amazing in light of the fact that the translators were not dispensationalists.
1. It is the only English translation that gets 2 Tim. 2:15 right
2. It is the only one that preserves Paul’s doctrine of justification by the faith OF Christ
3. It’s 66 books are laid out in a dispensational order
4. It has a built-in dictionary and cross-referencing system that greatly helps us to rightly divide

Our God is a God of truth (Jn. 14:6). Therefore, His word must be truth (Jn. 17:17). A Bible that has errors in it cannot be rightly called, “the word of truth.” If Christ would have sinned just one time, He could not be the Word of God. There are errors in all of the modern versions. There are no errors in the KJB. The KJB glorifies Christ more than all of the other versions. All of the modern versions diminish the person and work of Christ to some extent.

Most preachers and teachers claim that the Bible was only inspired in the original manuscripts and preserved in the original languages. That would be a real problem for us seeing as we don’t have the original manuscripts or know the original languages. Thankfully the Bible itself says no such thing. They claim that a translation cannot be inspired, and yet the Bible provides many examples of inspired translations. One of my favorite examples is found in Rom. 9:17 (Hebrew to Egyptian to Hebrew to Greek to English). Doesn’t it make sense that in this Gentile age God would preserve His word in the language that most Gentiles speak?

If we believe what the Bible says about itself, we will believe that there is a perfect copy of God’s inspired words available for us today. Where is it (2 Tim. 3:14-17; Ps. 12:6-7; 1 Pet. 1:23)? Those who don’t believe the KJB don’t believe any Bible is perfect. They claim to believe Gen. 1:1 but find it hard to believe God can give us a perfect Bible in English!

Do you follow Christ or Satan in how you approach and handle the scriptures?

Christ (Lk. 4:16-21)
1. He believed the copies available to Him were the scriptures
2. He rightly divided the word of truth (stopped reading in the middle of the sentence because was rightly dividing His first coming from His second coming)

Satan (Lk. 4:1-13)
1. He cast doubt on it and messed with the words (e.g. omitted words from Ps. 91:11)
2. He mixed it all up (e.g. it was not the right time or manner for Christ to receive the kingdoms)

Believing the Bible is foundational to rightly dividing it. Beware of those who try to rightly divide it without really believing it! I cannot overemphasize the importance of believing every word of God (Prov. 30:5-6)!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Our Rapture is not Revealed in John 14:1-3

John 14:1-3 [1] Let not your heart be troubled: ye believe in God, believe also in me.  [2] In my Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so , I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you.  [3] And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also.
The traditional view:  1. The Father's house is Heaven.  2. When Jesus ascended back to Heaven He started a construction project so that every believer will have their own mansion ("I don't know what it will be like, but if Jesus has been working on it for 2,000 years..."). But, He said “ARE many mansions,” not “WILL BE after I go build them.” 3. Christ is teaching His disciples about the rapture of the Church. 
One of the major hinderances to Bible study is reading truth back into a passage before it was revealed. The way this passage is usually taught is a great example of anticipating revelation. It is easy to read the Body of Christ…

Signs

Twelve important scriptural points concerning signs:

1) Signs are manifestations (such as miracles and wonders, Acts 2:22; Heb. 2:4) that are given to confirm what God has said (Mk. 16:20).

2) Satan can counterfeit signs (2 Thess. 2:9; Deut. 13:1-5), therefore the word of God is far more important than signs (2 Pet. 1:16-21).

3) God uses signs in His dealings with Israel (Ps. 74:9; Jn. 4:48; 1 Cor. 1:22); the nation of Israel began with signs (Ex. 4:1-9, 17).

4) Christ worked signs in fulfillment of prophecy and in accordance with His message (Matt. 11:1-6), not merely to prove He was the Son of God.

5) The signs pointed to the promised kingdom that was at hand; the gospel of the kingdom is accompanied by signs of the kingdom (Matt. 4:17, 23-24; Lk. 8:1).

6) Signs continued in the Acts period even after Israel fell because God was using Paul’s ministry to get a remnant out of Israel (Rom. 11:5) as they were being diminished throughout the transition period. Paul had the sig…

Justification: Paul vs. James

Job 25:4  How then can man be justified with God? or how can he be clean that is born of a woman?
How did the Holy Spirit answer through Paul? 
Romans 3:28  Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.
How did the Holy Spirit answer through James?
James 2:24  Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.
That is two different answers to the same question. Martin Luther acknowledged the difference between Paul and James, but he didn’t understand the difference. In frustration and confusion he referred to James as “an epistle of straw” and wanted to light his stove with it. He wrote, “Many sweat to reconcile St. Paul and St. James, but in vain. “Faith justifies” and “faith does not justify” contradict each other flatly. If anyone can harmonize them I will give him my Doctor’s Hood and let him call me a fool.”

The answer, of course, is to rightly divide the word of truth (2 Tim. 2:15). There are some clear distinctions between th…